To see the world in a grain of sand, and heaven in a wild flower; hold infinity in the palm of your hand, and eternity in an hour. William Blake, Auguries of Innocence. Stanza 1 One of the most fascinating and rewarding aspects of gemology is the study of inclusions. These tiny bits of entrapped foreign debris or structural irregularities reveal much about the gems in which they lie entombed. Often regarded as flaws, which detract from a stone's value, they are actually valuable clues that help unravel the secrets of a gem's past. Not only do inclusions speak to us of the place of formation, but they also serve as hallmarks of the processes which gave rise to precious stones. Flaws? Hardly. Without them the creations of nature would be almost indistinguishable from what Eduard Gübelin (1973) has so aptly termed "the usurpers from the factory."
History of inclusion researchWhile the study of gemstone inclusions has expanded greatly in the twentieth century, scientists have been peering into crystals for centuries. The great Roman polymath, Pliny, in his first-century AD encyclopedia, stated: "Further, one sees in false carbunculi certain small inclusions, that is blisters and vesicules, which look like silver." (Ball, 1950). This is doubtless a reference to the gas bubbles of glass. Al-Biruni, the 11th century Central Asian scholar, specifically mentioned inclusions in yakut, the Arabic word for corundum:
One can immediately read into the above, color zoning, included solids, healed fractures (fingerprints) and silk inclusions. With the invention of the microscope in the 17th century, it became possible for the first time to examine the interior of gems up close. But the modern era of inclusion research did not really begin until the 1820s, with the papers of Davy (1822), Brewster (1826, 1827), Sorby (1858), Sorby & Butler (1869), and Lea (1869a–b, 1876). These works accurately described fluid inclusions, including those of two and three-phases, as well the silk inclusions so common in corundums. In the modern era, no one has had a greater influence on inclusion research than Eduard Gübelin. While his first book on inclusions was published in 1953, he is largely known for his 1973 masterpiece, The Internal World of Gemstones. Here Gübelin combined the observational talents of a master scientist, with the aesthetic sensitivity of an artist and William Blake-like prose. It is one of those rare works which instantly transcends, and transforms, the field. Such was, and is, the influence of this work that no one who has seen this book ever looks at, or describes, the interior of a gemstone in the same way. While it has been superseded by Gübelin's, Koivula's and other's later works, it has not been topped. The Internal World of Gemstones remains a gemological tour de force.
The microscope – A gemologist's best friendTo view inclusions, a microscope is required. In terms of optics, look for a stereo-zoom head with a magnification range from 10–60x (this can be increased with stronger eyepieces and/or a doubling objective lens). Surprisingly enough, quality of optics is not nearly so important as the microscope base. Many so-called gemological microscopes are lacking in one important area – lighting. Without proper illumination, one sees nothing, even with the best optics. Thus a microscope must possess an extremely strong, built-in light source (a 35-watt quartz halogen bulb is the absolute minimum). GIA/Gem Instruments' Gemolite base is one of the best available for all-round use. Even better is that designed by Marc Bogerd and the author for the Asian Institute of Gemological Sciences. The Gemolite is greatly improved by modification. Dump the 35-watt bulb and move up to a more powerful model. Use of a bulb with a vertical filament (as opposed to horizontal) produces a wider band of effective illumination. While the stronger bulb may create problems for heat-sensitive gems, it is worth the risk. Once again, if the specimen is not adequately illuminated, you see nothing. The humble stoneholder is another oft-overlooked aspect of microscope design. A poor-quality stoneholder inevitably results in the "jewelers' prayer meeting" – down on your knees praying to find a stone that has flown out of sight. Surprisingly, many stone holders lack a knurled groove on the inside to grasp the stone's girdle. The best used by the author was that made by GIA/Gem Instruments; however it is no longer made.1
Mastering the microscope – Illumination techniquesDark fieldThe mainstay of the gem microscope, dark-field illumination brings light from the sides (via a reflector), thus silhouetting inclusions on a dark background. It is good for viewing a variety of solid and fluid inclusions, as well as narrow growth lines. Handheld fiber-optic lights can also be used to provide dark-field illumination. In many respects, they are superior to the built-in dark-field microscope lighting. One of the keys to successful use of the microscope is mastering the various illumination techniques. Below are shown many of the important lighting methods for gemstones. (Modified from Koivula, 1981)
Figure 3. Light field (transmitted light)Good for locating broad areas of color zoning, as well as checking inclusion transparency. If the iris diaphragm is narrowed to an aperture slightly less than the diameter of the gem, this is also useful for seeing into heavily included gems.
Figure 4. Diffuse light field (white filter)Diffuse light-field illumination is achieved by placing a frosted white plastic or glass filter over the microscope. It is useful for locating broad growth zoning, and is even better with the addition of an immersion cell and appropriate liquid. Surface-diffusion treated corundums are readily detected by this method.
Figure 5. Diffuse light-field (blue filter)With yellow and orange sapphires, a special need arises. Many microscopes have light sources with a yellowish tint. When combined with the yellowish color of the di-iodomethane immersion fluid, it is no wonder that curved color banding in synthetic yellow/orange sapphires is difficult to see. Addition of a frosted blue filter counteracts the yellow color of the light and liquid, allowing the growth features of yellow and orange stones to be seen more readily (Hughes, 1988; see Figure 7).
Figure 6.
Overhead lightingWhen surface features are to be examined (either on the stone or on the inclusion itself), overhead lighting is needed. This is obtained either by a built-in overhead light or by using the handheld fiber-optic light. Generally the fiber-optic light works best. Examination of inclusion surfaces can provide valuable clues as to their identity.
Figure 8. ImmersionDue to a gem's shape, it is often difficult to see its interior clearly. Immersion in a liquid of similar RI (di-iodomethane for corundum) greatly reduces surface reflections. Horizontal immersion microscopes, which allow one to examine the specimen while remaining seated, are popular in Germany. Vertical models are common in the USA. I prefer the vertical models, because manipulation of the stone is far easier and quicker (to change the gem's position in the stoneholder, it is simply placed on the bottom of the cell and picked up in a different position). When looking for subtle features, such as curved growth zoning in synthetic yellow sapphires, one hour or more may be required. The difficulty of specimen manipulation with horizontal microscopes increases examination times by a factor of five to ten. To overcome the comfort problem of using a vertical microscope for immersion, it is best to place it on a low platform, so that one can remain seated while examining the specimen (Hughes, 1989, 1990).
Figure 9. Crossed polarsExamining a gem between crossed polars is the best way to locate the presence of twinning and structural strain. Immersion may also be used together with this method. Twinning planes will appear as bright planes against a dark background as the gem is rotated. Plato twinning in Verneuil synthetic corundum is seen by viewing the gem parallel to the optic axis while immersed between crossed polars. Crossed polars are also useful for separating solid crystals from negative crystals (solid crystals may display a different extinction from the host, if they are birefringent).
Figure 10. Light field shadowingJohn Koivula (1982b) has described a lighting technique which he has dubbed shadowing. Shadowing involves opening the microscope to normal light field and passing the edge of an object (such as a business card) between the stone and light. If done properly, detail is enhanced in a narrow part of the stone. This is useful for resolving the fine detail of narrow growth lines, especially those in natural corundum and the curved striae of Verneuil and Czochralski synthetic rubies. Ideally the edge of the business card should run parallel to the growth lines. Another method is to narrow the microscope's iris diaphragm to a size just less than the stone's diameter.
Inclusion types & formationWhat is an inclusion?John Koivula (1991) has provided us with probably the best definition of the word inclusion: Broadly defined, an inclusion is any irregularity observable in a gem – by the unaided eye or [using] some tool such as a hand lens or microscope. The 'irregularity' may be a substance, such as a solid mineral crystal or a fluid filling a cavity, or it may be an unfilled cavity, a fracture, or a growth pattern that produces some optical effect. Inclusions in gemstones can be classified according to the scheme proposed by Gübelin (1973) and Gübelin & Koivula (1986), which is based upon their age with respect to that of the host crystal. This is as follows: Pre-existing inclusions (protogenetic)Inclusions that have formed before the host. These are strictly of a solid nature (pre-existing liquids and gases don't count).
Solid and semi-solid inclusionsCrystals and/or glasses that form before the host and are subsequently trapped. The crystals may appear either as heavily etched or corroded individuals which formed long before the host, or as well-formed crystals which developed just prior to the host Examples: Various, including spinel in ruby. Corundums which formed in metamorphic environments, such as Burmese rubies, are often rich in solid inclusions. Contemporary inclusions (syngenetic)Inclusions that have formed at the same time as the host. Solid and semi-solid inclusionsCrystals and/or glasses that form, and are trapped, at the same time as the host. It is usually impossible to tell from a microscopic examination whether or not a solid inclusion formed before the host. Examples: Various, including calcite and dolomite in ruby from metamorphic environments (such as Mogok, Burma).
Primary cavitiesThese consist of cavities formed while the host itself was growing. When they display some semblance of crystal shape, they are termed negative crystals. They may be trapped for a variety of reasons (see Figure 17), most commonly due to rapid growth. When a crystal grows rapidly, it no longer grows with smooth, flat faces, but instead grows with faces that have channels.2 Such channels provide perfect pockets for trapping of the growth solution. Primary cavities may be filled with liquid alone (single phase), liquid + gas or liquid + solid (two-phase), or liquid + gas + solid (three-phase). At times, the gas bubble of a primary cavity may move. Edwin Roedder (1962) described it thus:
According to Roedder (1982), crystals which have grown from metamorphic environments tend to be relatively deficient in primary fluid inclusions. Instead of growing as free crystals, protruding into the fluid from which they grew, crystals in metamorphic rocks have grown in an essentially solid medium by migration of the nutrients via diffusion through other crystals, along grain boundaries, or through a fluid film in the grain boundaries. Space for the growth is found by the dissolution or shoving aside of adjoining crystals. As a result, crystals formed in metamorphic rocks often contain many solid inclusions, but few, if any, fluid inclusions. Primary cavities generally result where certain areas of the host have grown more rapidly than others, forming, and eventually enclosing, voids. Flat crystal faces, once facing outward, now enclose hollow spaces, and may look just like solid crystals. These voids usually contain a liquid and/or gas bubble trapped at the time of their enclosure. Other solids may also be enclosed (or crystallize later from the trapped fluid). Scientists study such trapped fluids, for they provide important clues regarding the conditions under which the gem formed, being remnants of the original growth solution. Negative crystals can often be recognized by identical crystal orientation to the host, along with their high relief, due to the liquid or gas filling. More substantial evidence is provided by the gas bubble sometimes trapped within the liquid. It is always delightful to observe a bubble which bobs up and down as the crystal is tilted in the microscope. Such mobile bubbles are quite common in minerals like quartz and fluorite, but less so in corundum (except from Sri Lanka and Madagascar). Heat treatment will often cause explosion of such negative crystals (Koivula, 1980a; 1986). Examples. Primary cavities are common in all minerals, especially in gems which grow from solution environments, such as quartz, fluorite, beryl, and corundum.
Primary growth phenomena
The external surfaces of synthetic single crystals grown by the Verneuil, Czochralski and floating zone processes are not flat, and so the growth lines are not straight. Synthetic gems grown by the flux and hydrothermal processes possess flat faces, and so will display straight growth lines meeting at the face angles.
Secondary inclusions (epigenetic)Inclusions that have formed immediately, or even millions of years, after the host stopped growing. Solid inclusionsExsolved crystals – Exsolution is the "unmixing" of a solid solution. At high temperatures, crystals have more defects, and thus are better able to absorb impurities. As the crystal cools, defects are reduced. This may force impurities to crystallize out. But because of the constraints placed on their movement by the solid host, impurity atoms are unable to travel large distances. Therefore, rather than forming large crystals, they migrate short distances to form multitudes of tiny needles, plates and particles, along the directions in the host where space permits. One of the keys to recognizing exsolved inclusions is that they always form in a specific pattern within the host. That pattern may be different for different minerals crystallizing within the same host material (for example, rutile is exsolved in corundum in three directions crossing at 60/120° in the basal plane). Virtually all tiny, oriented needle, particle and platelike inclusions found in minerals are formed via exsolution. These inclusions give rise to asterism and cat's eye phenomena. Examples: rutile and hematite-ilmenite silk and needles in corundum. One of the most diagnostic features of corundum is the white clouds of exsolved rutile (TiO2 ). According to Gübelin (1940, 1953), Gustav von Tschermak (1878) was the first to identify rutile in corundum. Such clouds vary from dense concentrations which follow, and distort, the crystals' color zoning, to thinly-woven tapestries. At times, only slender threads or particles are visible, while in other cases knife or dart shapes appear (see Figure 21). Closer examination reveals many of these to be twin crystals with tiny v-shaped re-entrant angles visible at the broad end. They are flattened so thin in the basal plane that, when illuminated with a fiber-optic light guide from above, bursts of iridescent colors are seen, due to the interference of light from these microscopically-thin mineral lances.
The needle clouds just described are termed silk, in analogy to their threadlike pattern and are responsible for the asterism, or star effect. Not only rutile may form silk in corundum; hematite (Fe2O3), ilmenite (FeTiO3) or hematite-ilmenite mixtures have been reported. Rutile in corundum tends to unmix parallel to the faces of the second-order hexagonal prism {1120}, intersecting in three directions at 60/120° in the basal plane (Sahama, 1982). Hematite-ilmenite exsolves in the basal plane parallel to the first-order hexagonal prism {1010} (Moon & Phillips, 1984). Thus when both rutile and hematite-ilmenite are present in the same crystal, a 12-rayed star is possible.
Another exsolved inclusion in corundum is boehmite. Consisting of hydrous aluminum oxide (gamma AlO·OH), it is produced in corundum by alteration at stress points along the edges of the rhombohedron faces. This occurs along a total of three directions (meeting at 86.1/93.9°), but only two directions occur in the same plane. These planes lie at approximately 30/60° to the c axis.
Secondary cavitiesThese are healed fractures. Any time after the host has grown it may crack. If the conditions are right, growth solutions may enter the crack and dissolve its walls. Dissolved nutrient material is later re-deposited on the walls of the crack, causing it to "heal" shut. Some cracks have healed more than others, but most cracks are in some stage of healing. Healing leaves behind tiny pockets of growth solution which has exhausted its nutrients, and so stopped healing. All that is needed for healing to continue is for the gem to be heated up enough so that the trapped solvent can further dissolve the walls of the cavities. Then the healing continues. As healing progresses, pockets of trapped solvent become smaller and more regular in shape. Eventually, a healed crack has the appearance of tiny crystals scattered in a "fingerprint" or "feather" pattern. The individual cavities may be filled with a liquid alone, liquid + gas, liquid + solid, or liquid + gas + solid, and may usually be differentiated from primary fluid inclusions by their tiny cavities, curved outlines and fingerprint-like patterns. In contrast, primary negative crystals tend to occur singly, and in larger sizes (Eppler, 1966).
Fractures may develop for a number of reasons, including simple shock, or more likely, from the buildup of strain due to rapid growth or tectonic forces. Immediately, or even millions of years later, the healing process can begin. Should cracks develop as a crystal is growing, the growth solutions penetrate the open wound via capillary action. If the temperature of the surrounding environment is high, healing progresses rapidly; at lower temperatures the pace is slower. The inner walls of the curving fracture are dissolved and solutions redeposit this material, as well as any nutrients carried in by the solution itself, forming flat crystal faces. Slowly, inexorably so, the crack is sealed, leaving behind pockets of undigested fluid in fanciful designs termed fingerprints, feathers, insect wings, etc. Should the conditions be favorable, this ongoing process of solution and re-deposition of internal fracture walls eventually results in highly angular pockets of fluid, actually groups of fluid-filled negative crystals arranged in a fingerprint pattern (Roedder, 1962). Experiments performed by Eppler (1966) and others on different minerals, including Verneuil synthetic ruby, have confirmed the above reconstruction of events leading to the formation of healing fissures and negative crystals in gemstones.
In nature, the healing process may take place over millions of years. Thus the resulting cavities are often well developed and display intricate growth features. In corundum, when the fracture was in or near the basal plane, the pockets of undigested fluid often surround hexagonal "islands" of healed material. But if the fracture is along a prism face, such healed islands tend to be rectangular (see Figure 25). Tiny growth steps or "terraces" provide further evidence of the amazing regularity of crystallization processes. In many cases, the residual fluid is so thin that brilliant interference colors are seen when illuminated at the proper angle from above (fiber-optic lighting provides an excellent illumination source for such observations). Although flux-grown synthetic corundums may contain flux-filled inclusions formed by a similar healing process, the tremendous detail of nature is missing, because of greater flux viscosity and the far shorter growth times. Thus, the gemologist should carefully study the healing fissures in natural rubies and sapphires under high magnification. They can provide important clues in distinguishing between natural and synthetic corundum.
Secondary growth phenomenaSecondary Twinning – Twinning that has formed after the host. When such twinning occurs repeatedly throughout the crystal, it is termed "polysynthetic twinning."
Within corundum, polysynthetic twinning occurs parallel to the faces of the rhombohedron {1011}, which intersect each other at angles of 86.1 and 93.9° and meet the c axis at 32.4/57.6°. Repeated twinning in corundum is easily observed under the microscope. The planes are only visible when looking exactly along them, and generally pass across the entire stone (although not always). Since polysynthetic twinning takes place on the rhombohedron faces, it is located by looking in directions at about 33/57° to the c axis. Most natural corundums are cut with the c axis perpendicular to the table facet; in such stones the rhombohedral twinning will be found lying about 33/57° off the table. Immersing a gem in di-iodomethane and examining it between crossed polars allows the twinning to be located most quickly, as it appears as bright planes fringed with interference colors against a dark background. It can be a stunning visual effect (see Figure 26, top). A final note on inclusion categoriesGems often display inclusions involving combinations of the above categories. For example, so-called "Saturn" inclusions of Thai/Cambodian rubies are actually solid crystals which, when they cooled, created tension resulting in a healed fracture surrounding the crystal. While the host/inclusion age relationship will sometimes be obvious (such as inclusions produced by exsolution, which are always epigenetic), many times it is impossible to determine. So don't worry if you cannot determine a particular inclusion's age relationship to the host.
Identifying solid inclusionsUnfortunately, most publications do not mention exactly how the identity of a solid inclusion was determined. The following are common techniques (based on Hänni, 1987): X-ray powder diffraction methodA small amount of powdered material from a solid inclusion is required. If the inclusion is not exposed at the surface, the specimen is ground to expose it. Using a diamond file or point, the inclusion is scraped to gather material, which is then powdered and used for a powder-diffraction x-ray photo. The resulting diffraction pattern is compared to known samples for identification. Electron beam methodsWhen a solid inclusion is exposed at the surface, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled to the electron microprobe (EMP) can be used. A fine beam of electrons is directed onto the inclusion surface. This generates x-rays which are typical in terms of energy or wavelength for each element present. Emitted radiation (fluorescence) can be analyzed using an energy-dispersive system (EDS) attached to the SEM or EMP, with the resulting energy spectrum allowing one to make a qualitative determination of the chemical composition. The SEM has the advantage of being able to strongly magnify the analyzed area and produce pictures of the surface, while the EMP is used primarily for full quantitative chemical analysis. Both techniques are nondestructive, but suffer from an inability to detect the lightest elements. Raman-laser probeSolid, liquid or gaseous inclusions can be analyzed with this technique. A monochromatic laser beam is focused on the inclusion, and, via interaction with oscillating molecules, undergoes a frequency change characteristic of the material excited. The resulting spectra, recorded in the infrared region, are compared to reference spectra for known solid, liquid and gaseous phases. Of the methods discussed, the Raman technique is the least-commonly used in gemology. Optical methodsInclusions are typically identified by their appearance under the microscope (crystal habit, color, relief, luster, orientation, etc.). This has the advantage of simplicity, but depends entirely on the tester's experience. Only a microscope is needed and inclusions need not be exposed at the surface, but, of all the methods described, it is the least reliable. Unfortunately, for the vast majority of gemologists, it is the only method to which they have access, but by carefully describing the inclusion many problems can be mitigated.
Overview of corundum inclusionsSee Table 1 for a summary of the possible inclusions in corundum. For details and references on the individual occurrences of these inclusions, see the country listings in Chapter 12. Country descriptions of inclusionsIn Chapter 12, the inclusions of corundums are described for each major source, alphabetically by country. It must be stressed that it is often impossible to determine the age of a given inclusion with respect to the host. For this reason, only the type, position and appearance have been described. The author has not personally collected and tested samples from each and every mine (the only sure way of determining origin). Thus, the descriptions are based on the best-available data, first and secondhand, at the time of writing. The descriptions are in no way sufficient for determining the origin of corundums, and even if they were, origin reports in their current form are not something I feel gemologists should be doing. Suffice to say that, similar to humans, all of the corundums to which I have spoken claim planet earth as their home. It may be of academic and historical interest to know where someone comes from, and so it is for gems. But an origin determination of an individual gem without reference to its quality is as senseless as applying ethnic generalizations to individual humans.3 An additional fly in the origin ointment is that heat treatment often obscures origin information. This may be a blessing in disguise, for it could push the trade into concentrating their efforts on separating natural from treated and synthetic stones, rather than worrying about geographic origin. In this area, the colored stone trade has much to learn from the diamond business. After all, how many customers ask for, say, a Botswana diamond? Notes BibliographyBuy the BookThis page is http://www.ruby-sapphire.com/r-s-bk-ch5.htm v. 1.0 Page updated 11 August, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||